Skip to content
Vol. IV · Issue III · 08 May 2026 N 40°42′47″ · W 74°00′21″ Cal. 2026-05-07 14:32 UTC · σ 0.61 ● Lab in session
PLATE I NOVOS (NOVOS Age) · Biological Age Testing N 40°42′ · W 74°00′ SCALE 1 : 1 device · N · NEARCTIC
Plate I · Biological Age Testing

NOVOS (NOVOS Age)

Best price-to-depth ratio in the blood-based epigenetic category; Public Benefit Corporation ethos; free AI-based age tool as entry point; strong supplement ecosystem (NOVOS Core / Boost)

· Not yet tested
BY · Biohacker Atlas Editorial Team · Editorial collective
PUB ·
NOT CLEARED

No FDA clearance, registration, or CE marking found.

No subscription
Visit NOVOS (NOVOS Age) → From $0
Fig. I · Bench readout

Key facts at a glance.

Founded
2018
Headquarters
New York, NY, US
Price range
$0–$349
Pricing as published by the manufacturer Trustpilot · refreshed weekly Bench measurements forthcoming
Fig. II · Cost of ownership

The real price over three years.

NOVOS (NOVOS Age) · 3-year horizon

Total cost of ownership · 3yr

Hardwareone-time$0
3-year total$0
Hardware · subscription · consumables · energy Year toggle: 1 / 2 / 3 / 5 Per § 3 of the legend
Fig. III · Key features

What the device does.

  • + ~900,000 CpG sites analyzed (blood finger-prick)
  • + 3rd-generation DunedinPACE clock + organ age algorithms
  • + 4 key results: biological age, rate of aging, 11 organ ages, telomere length
  • + 55-page personalized longevity blueprint report
  • + Free ENABL Age AI biological age clock (photo-based estimate)
  • + NOVOS Life AI app for ongoing guidance
  • + Public Benefit Corporation
  • + At-home finger-prick collection
Fig. IV · Strengths & weaknesses

The trade-offs.

↑ Pros
  • + **Best price-to-depth ratio in the blood-based epigenetic category** — DunedinPACE + 11 organ ages at $349
  • + ~900,000 CpG sites analyzed (close to TruDiagnostic's 950k at lower price)
  • + 4 key results: biological age + rate of aging + 11 organ ages + telomere length
  • + 55-page personalized longevity blueprint report
  • + Free ENABL Age AI biological age clock as entry-level tool
  • + Public Benefit Corporation ethos
↓ Cons
  • **Slightly less resolution than TruDiagnostic** (900k vs 950k CpGs)
  • Smaller brand awareness than TruDiagnostic or Elysium
  • 4-week turnaround (similar to TruDiagnostic; behind InsideTracker InnerAge 3-5 days)
  • Supplement cross-selling (NOVOS Core / Boost) may feel pushy
  • Limited independent Trustpilot / review presence
Fig. V · Best for

Longevity-focused consumers seeking a balanced price-to-depth ratio, supplement-savvy biohackers, people tracking intervention outcomes

Fig. VI · Editorial review

The long read.

§ Hands-on instrument testing pending. Based on published specifications and third-party data.

Overview

NOVOS (NOVOS Age) is the best price-to-depth ratio specialist in blood-based epigenetic bio-age testing — manufactured by NOVOS Labs (founded 2018 in NYC, Public Benefit Corporation), with structural value claim built on DunedinPACE clock + 11 organ ages + ~900,000 CpG sites at $349 pricing. The structural positioning is TruDiagnostic-equivalent depth at meaningfully lower price — close to TruDiagnostic’s 950k CpGs (only 50k difference) at $349 vs TruDiagnostic’s $399-799.

The structural value claim is genuine within the value-tier blood-based positioning: ~900,000 CpG sites analyzed via blood finger-prick collection, 3rd-generation DunedinPACE clock + organ age algorithms, 4 key results (biological age + rate of aging + 11 organ ages + telomere length) provide comprehensive multi-dimensional bio-age view. 55-page personalized longevity blueprint report delivers actionable recommendations beyond TruDiagnostic’s 85-page report at higher price. Free ENABL Age AI clock (photo-based estimate) provides entry-level accessibility before committing to paid test. Public Benefit Corporation ethos appeals to mission-aligned buyers.

The structural editorial caveats: slightly less resolution than TruDiagnostic (900k vs 950k CpGs — meaningful but small differential), smaller brand awareness than TruDiagnostic or Elysium, 4-week turnaround matches TruDiagnostic but lags InsideTracker InnerAge’s 3-5 days, supplement cross-selling (NOVOS Core / Boost products) may feel like upselling, and limited independent Trustpilot / review presence. For users matched to value-tier blood-based epigenetic positioning with DunedinPACE preference, NOVOS Age is structurally appropriate. For users wanting maximum resolution (TruDiagnostic 950k), strongest brand recognition (TruDiagnostic), or non-supplement-affiliated brand, alternatives are structurally better.

When NOVOS Age Makes Sense

Strong fit: Best price-to-depth ratio priority; DunedinPACE 3rd-generation clock preference; users wanting 11 organ ages + telomere length comprehensive view; Public Benefit Corporation ethos alignment; supplement-savvy biohackers in NOVOS ecosystem.

Weaker fit: Maximum resolution preference (TruDiagnostic 950k); strongest brand recognition (TruDiagnostic, Elysium); fastest turnaround (InsideTracker 3-5 days); supplement-cross-selling-averse buyers; minimalist single-number result preference (myDNAge).

3-Year Cost of Ownership

Use caseCost
NOVOS Age single test~$349
Annual retest~$1,047 / 3 yr
3-year ownership~$350-1,050

Compare: TruDiagnostic ($399-799), Elysium Index ($299), GlycanAge ($348), Tally Health ($229), Generation Lab ($490-500), MyDNAge ($299), Viome ($129-399 multi-omic).

NOVOS (NOVOS Age) earns a recommended verdict on the strength of its best price-to-depth ratio in blood-based epigenetic category (~900,000 CpGs + DunedinPACE + 11 organ ages at $349 — close to TruDiagnostic’s 950k depth at meaningfully lower price), 4 key results comprehensive multi-dimensional bio-age view (biological age + rate of aging + 11 organ ages + telomere length), 55-page personalized longevity blueprint report, free ENABL Age AI clock entry-level tool, Public Benefit Corporation ethos, and at-home finger-prick collection.

For value-priority blood-based epigenetic users wanting DunedinPACE 3rd-generation methodology + 11 organ ages at $349, NOVOS Age is structurally the leading consumer choice. For maximum resolution (TruDiagnostic), strongest brand recognition, fastest turnaround, or supplement-cross-selling-averse positioning, alternatives are structurally better matched.

Changelog

  • 2026-05-07: Initial review published based on NOVOS (NOVOS Age) published specifications, DunedinPACE methodology positioning, Public Benefit Corporation ethos, ENABL Age AI tool documentation, and aggregated user-report data.
Fig. VII · Hands-on protocol on file

What we'll measure on the bench.

Protocol
Methodology audit + 3-month paired retest
Primary metric
Δ biological age between paired tests
Pass threshold
<±2 yr drift across stable-lifestyle window
Session shape
2 paired tests, 3 months apart

§ Bench session pending. Measured values will replace this panel as the protocol completes — see Plate VI · Methodology for the full testing rulebook.

← Back to Biological Age Testing territory